You are currently browsing the archives for the Security Policy category.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
8 October 2009 by Jeff Hayes.
As an adjunct instructor at ITT Technical Institute for the past four years, I enjoy introducing a new topic to the newer students and then to see them a year or two later and see how far they have come.
For most, the concept of policy and more specifically, security policy, is foreign. I think they must get tired of hearing me answer: “it all depends” or “what is the policy and why does it exist that way?”
Joan Goodchild, Senior Editor of CSO magazine, wrote a recent article, The Seven Deadly Sins of Security Policy. Here are her security policy deadly sins:
It is my experience that the biggest issue is lack of buy in from the top. Without top level buy in, why should any one read, follow or believe the policies are enforceable?
For many organizations, security is viewed as the “business prevention department.” The challenge security professionals have the world over is justifying the associated expenses. Security is an expense but for many organizations, it might be absolutely necessary, even an item that be be used to differentiate it from its competition, attract employees, and have a positive impact the bottom line.
There are many deadly sins with respect to security, and the worst is something many organizations are guilty of (not being one of the seven): they have no formal security policies.
Posted in Security Policy | Print | No Comments »
6 October 2009 by Jeff Hayes.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, as part of its National Cyber Security Awareness Month, has created a list of fourteen things home users can do to bolster cyber security.
Good list? Yes.
What about business? The best checklist I have found for good cyber security for the average business is from the Payment Card Industry within its Data Security Standard:
Simple? No. But is a great list to build a security plan upon.
Posted in Security Policy, Personal Security, Homeland Security | Print | No Comments »
2 October 2009 by Jeff Hayes.
October is National Cyber Security Awareness Month, as proclaimed by the U.S. DHS. The premise behind this is good: create awareness for cyber security. The DHS’s campaign will seek to:
Security professionals the world over need all the help they can get to create awareness of their craft. For the most part, security measures, be they physical or cyber, are business expenses. The challenge security professionals have is to justify those expenses in a manner that helps improve the overall business appeal from the prospectives of the customers, partners, employees and investors.
For most of us working in the cyber security profession, we are viewed a smart but our value is questioned. “We pay this guy how much for doing what exactly?” “If we did not do ‘this’, what would be the impact?” “Do we really need to jump through all of these hoops?” “Do we really need to buy all of these security tools, applications and appliances?” “Wasn’t our security policy just updated?”
Some things are just hard. Cyber security is one of those hard things. It is tough to see, quantify and qualify. The better we are at creating reasonable awareness of the issues confronting or business and industry, the better and more effective we will all be at performing our security jobs.
Posted in Security Policy, Homeland Security | Print | No Comments »
8 September 2009 by Jeff Hayes.
There are things that we should fear and there are things we should not fear. Lost data due to poor backup procedures, not safeguarding core intellectual property, and security policies with no enforcement teeth are things we should fear. Terrorism (unless you are DHS or are a high-value target) is one that we ought to put low on our list of concerns.
Joan Goodchild, Senior Editor, CSO magazine wrote the Seven Deadly Sins of Building Security:
This list is a solid list based on the prudent man principle of information security: Those with responsibility to invest money in order to secure the operations should act with prudence, discretion, intelligence, and regard for the safety of capital as well as the desired and resulting level of information security.
There are all types of security people — and we need them all — from the firewall/IDS/network security specialist and physical security specialist to the policy writers and auditors. However, we need a manager that sees and understands all of the key parts of organizational security and can map them to coincide with the organizational goals.
The key is to make a regular and complete assessment, implement accurate and quality processes, procedures and technology solutions, and to manage and monitor it continuously. Then stay at it, doing it over and over. Boring yes, but good security was never designed to be exciting. It needs to be in place when it is needed.
Finding one that can balance between what is good and financially in-line for the organization and what a security purist hopes for is where you will find the prudent man (or woman) of information security
Posted in Security Management, Security Policy | Print | No Comments »
31 July 2009 by Jeff Hayes.
P2P legislation talk is rearing its head again.
House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Edolphus Towns today is expected to blame the Bush administration for having a laissez-faire attitude that has allowed privacy and security problems posed by peer-to-peer networks to persist online. At a hearing on the topic, he is likely to call for legislation to guard against inadvertent file-sharing, heightened FCC involvement and the creation of a public awareness campaign to inform people about the dangers of P2P software.
Making a law outlawing P2P software is not the answer, policy enforcement is. It is not P2P service providers fault that enterprise users elect to load and use P2P software for access to images, programs, and entertainment.
P2P software is something found on just about every home computer where there is a user under 30 years of age. They see the direct benefits of “free” music, TV shows and movies. Most have never experienced negatives: no police knocking at their door or security incidents rending their computers into boat anchors. Most have no idea what the risks are.
Using P2P software and public services on business or organizational networks raises a whole series of issues. Copyright infringement, unlicensed software and security issues galore from Trojan and bots to offensive materials can make their way throughout the network, not to mention the bandwidth usage and productivity issues.
If P2P software is found withing the enterprise, then there is either poor education, weak policies, poor enforcement or a combination of all three. A law will still require education and enforcement. Solid policy and associated enforcement is better medicine than Congressional actions.
Posted in Security Policy, Infrastructure Security | Print | 1 Comment »